AI in May (2026)
Written by Emily Wolfteich
Senior Industry Analyst
1. The Pentagon says it will “never again” rely on a single AI provider.
In early May, Defense Under Secretary for Research and Engineering Emil Michael announced that the Department of Defense would "never again" depend on a single AI vendor, framing newly signed agreements with multiple commercial AI companies as a direct response to the Pentagon's recent experience with Anthropic. The announcement reinforced the department's shift toward a diversified, competitive AI ecosystem rather than exclusive platform relationships.
This signals a fundamental change in how the government intends to buy and deploy AI. Rather than pursuing monolithic enterprise contracts, the DoD appears to be building a modular marketplace where agencies can swap models as capabilities evolve. For industry, that suggests future federal AI procurements may increasingly reward interoperability and flexibility over vendor lock-in.
2. Pentagon expands GenAI.mil with eight commercial AI providers.
On May 1, Defense One reported that the Pentagon had reached agreements with eight companies to provide AI capabilities through GenAI.mil, the department's centralized generative AI platform for classified and sensitive environments. The initiative brings multiple frontier AI models into a common government-managed environment intended to accelerate operational use across the military.
This represents one of the clearest signs yet that the DoD is moving beyond experimentation and into enterprise deployment. Rather than treating AI as a collection of isolated pilots, GenAI.mil establishes shared infrastructure that can support multiple missions and organizations. The approach could become a model for how other federal agencies operationalize generative AI at scale.
3. Federal officials warn AI is compressing cyber response timelines.
At a May cybersecurity forum covered by GovExec, federal and intelligence leaders argued that advanced AI models are dramatically accelerating both cyberattacks and defensive operations. Officials described a new reality in which threat actors can automate exploitation while defenders increasingly rely on AI-assisted detection and remediation, with one participant characterizing the shift as turning "30 days" into "30 hours."
AI is becoming integral to cybersecurity operations instead of just a technology to be overseen. Agencies that fail to incorporate AI into detection and response workflows risk falling behind adversaries who are already leveraging automation. For technology vendors, this reinforces growing demand for "AI to protect AI" capabilities, autonomous remediation, and AI-enabled security operations.
4. California courts begin testing an AI “clerk” for judicial workflows
A major judicial AI pilot is underway in Los Angeles and Riverside counties, where courts are testing an artificial intelligence assistant to support clerical functions. The tool, called Learned Hand, is being used by “civil and probate attorneys [to] draft research memos that help judges reach their decisions,” adding that this research is typical support.
The initiative pushes generative AI into the justice system, one of the most sensitive arms of government. Unlike administrative chatbots or data analysis tools, judicial AI raises immediate questions about transparency, accountability, and public trust, particularly as it comes to criminal cases where an incorrect outcome can be the difference between justice and wrongful imprisonment. The outcome of these pilots could influence how other state and local governments approach AI adoption in legally consequential workflows.
5. Florida enacts new law governing AI data centers.
Florida has enacted legislation establishing new requirements for AI-related data center development, including provisions designed to ensure that the facilities bear their own utility costs rather than shifting those expenses onto consumers, allowing communities to set stricter policies, and building transparency and environmental protections into data center development. The law reflects the growing intersection of AI policy, energy infrastructure, and economic development at the state level.
The discussion around data centers has become a central and polarizing debate within the larger national AI conversation. As data centers proliferate at breakneck speed across the country, states are increasingly balancing the economic benefits of attracting AI investment against concerns about energy consumption, grid capacity, and local community impacts. Similar legislation is likely to emerge elsewhere as AI infrastructure expands across the country.
To read additional thought leadership from Emily, connect with her on LinkedIn.
Related Posts
AI in June (2026)
Explore key AI policy and technology developments from June 2026, including the Trump administration’s national security memorandum, OpenAI’s integration into Pentagon platforms, and new legislative proposals for military AI oversight.
Inside the Federal Buyer’s Mindset: What Changed in 2025 and What It Means for Contractors in 2026
The federal contracting marketplace underwent an unprecedented “recalibration” in 2025, learn more about what’s changed and what it means for contractors in 2026.
8 AI Trends to Watch in 2026
2026 is the year AI goes from bet to baseline in federal government. Explore 8 key AI trends, from institutionalization and operational reality to cybersecurity risks and DoD’s focus on reliable defense applications.
AI in December (2025)
A look at December’s top AI news in government: The House Task Force report, DHS’s DHSChat launch, and the White House’s 1,700+ federal AI use case inventory.
7 Ways BD & Sales Teams Can Use Federal Personas for Competitive Advantage
Explore 7 strategies for BD and sales teams to use research-based federal personas to sharpen pursuit strategy, tailor messaging, boost credibility, and gain a competitive edge in government contracting.
AI in August (2025)
Key AI news from August 2025: GSA launched USAi.Gov for federal AI adoption, the Pentagon’s Advana platform faced cuts and setbacks, and the Army tested smart glasses for vehicle maintenance. Also, the Department of Labor unveiled a national AI workforce strategy, and Colorado lawmakers began revising the state’s pioneering AI Act.
Deep Dive: Department of Treasury
A look inside Treasury’s 2026-era tech strategy: AI isn’t a standalone budget line — but ~$48.8 M funding for a centralized fraud-detection platform points to growing use of chatbots, generative AI pilots, taxpayer services, fraud monitoring, and data-driven automation under its IT-modernization efforts.
Decoding OMB Memorandums M-25-21 and M-25-22
Explains Office of Management and Budget (OMB) M‑25‑21 and M‑25‑22 — new federal‑AI directives that replace prior guidance, empower agencies to adopt AI faster, and streamline procurement, while aiming to balance innovation, governance and public trust.
News Bite: AI Slop, Jon Oliver, and (Literally) Fake News
Examines the rise of ‘AI slop’ — cheap, AI-generated content masquerading as real media — and how it’s fueling viral fake news, degrading digital discourse, and undermining trust online.
Deep Dive: Department of Defense
Overview of the Department of Defense’s FY 2026 budget: $961.6 billion total, with heavy investment in AI, unmanned aerial, ground, maritime, and undersea systems — spotlighting a modernization push across all domains.
AI in July (2025)
Federal AI Policy Heats Up in July: The Trump administration unveiled its “America’s AI Action Plan,” prompting a lawsuit over deregulation and a battle with states. Also featuring: a new defense bill with AI provisions and GSA’s $1 ChatGPT deal for federal agencies.
AI in Government: A Question of Trust
Explores how the use of AI by government agencies raises fundamental questions of trust — weighing the benefits of efficiency, fraud detection and streamlined services against serious risks around bias, transparency, accountability, and public confidence.
Insights at a Glance: May 2025
A data driven rundown of the latest federal AI, policy and government‑tech developments from May 2025.
AI in April (2025)
April’s AI news: New White House policies, controversial federal agency automation, military digital overhaul, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, and plans to integrate AI in K-12 education.
Insights at a Glance: March 2025
A data driven rundown of the latest federal AI, policy and government‑tech developments from March 2025.
Policy Dive: AI in the First Week of Trump
Covers the first‑week AI moves by the new administration — from revoking prior federal AI safeguards to launching a sweeping AI‑domination agenda that prioritizes innovation and global competitiveness over prior guardrails.
AI in January (2025)
Explore the new Trump administration’s deregulatory shift, the massive “Stargate Project” with tech giants, the emergence of a high-performing, cost-effective Chinese AI model (DeepSeek), the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT Gov, and key ethical priorities set by the NAIAC.
Artificial Intelligence & the Government: Who’s Driving the Car?
The GAO’s report on the federal government’s adoption of AI is as comprehensive as it can be – but do we like what we see?
How government can experience the Great Stay
As the labor market begins to stabilize, experts predict FY 2024 to be the year of “The Great Stay” among the federal workforce.
AI & the Pentagon: Cautiously Curious
As AI hype increases across the public and private sectors, organizations are weighing the possibilities (and risks) the tech creates.